↓ Skip to main content

Tryptophan-Accelerated Electron Flow Through Proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
376 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tryptophan-Accelerated Electron Flow Through Proteins
Published in
Science, June 2008
DOI 10.1126/science.1158241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Crystal Shih, Anna Katrine Museth, Malin Abrahamsson, Ana Maria Blanco-Rodriguez, Angel J. Di Bilio, Jawahar Sudhamsu, Brian R. Crane, Kate L. Ronayne, Mike Towrie, Antonín Vlček, John H. Richards, Jay R. Winkler, Harry B. Gray

Abstract

Energy flow in biological structures often requires submillisecond charge transport over long molecular distances. Kinetics modeling suggests that charge-transfer rates can be greatly enhanced by multistep electron tunneling in which redox-active amino acid side chains act as intermediate donors or acceptors. We report transient optical and infrared spectroscopic experiments that quantify the extent to which an intervening tryptophan residue can facilitate electron transfer between distant metal redox centers in a mutant Pseudomonas aeruginosa azurin. Cu(I) oxidation by a photoexcited Re(I)-diimine at position 124 on a histidine(124)-glycine(123)-tryptophan(122)-methionine(121) beta strand occurs in a few nanoseconds, fully two orders of magnitude faster than documented for single-step electron tunneling at a 19 angstrom donor-acceptor distance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 277 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 31%
Researcher 63 22%
Professor 32 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 32 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 146 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 15%
Physics and Astronomy 29 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Materials Science 8 3%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 36 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,173,745
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Science
#44,804
of 78,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,880
of 82,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#254
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.