↓ Skip to main content

Cyclin-Dependent Kinases Control Septin Phosphorylation in Candida albicans Hyphal Development

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Cell, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cyclin-Dependent Kinases Control Septin Phosphorylation in Candida albicans Hyphal Development
Published in
Developmental Cell, September 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.06.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Indrajit Sinha, Yan-Ming Wang, Robin Philp, Chang-Run Li, Wai Ho Yap, Yue Wang

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) control cytoskeleton polarization in yeast morphogenesis. However, the target and mechanism remain unclear. Here, we show that the Candida albicans Cdk Cdc28, through temporally controlled association with two cyclins Ccn1 and Hgc1, rapidly establishes and persistently maintains phosphorylation of the septin cytoskeleton protein Cdc11 for hyphal development. Upon hyphal induction, Cdc28-Ccn1 binds to septin complexes and phosphorylates Cdc11 on Ser394, a nonconsensus Cdk target. This phosphorylation requires prior phosphorylation on Ser395 by the septin-associated kinase Gin4. Mutating Ser394 or Ser395 blocked Cdc11 phosphorylation on Ser394 and impaired hyphal morphogenesis. Reconstitution experiments using purified Cdc28-Ccn1, Gin4, and septins reproduced phosphorylations on the same residues. Transient septin-Cdc28 associations were also detected prior to bud and mating-projection emergence in S. cerevisiae. Our study uncovers a direct link between the cell-cycle engine and the septin cytoskeleton that may be part of a conserved mechanism underlying polarized morphogenesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Burkina Faso 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2007.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cell
#3,490
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,348
of 81,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cell
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.