You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
GWAS and colocalization analyses implicate carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque loci in cardiovascular outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-07340-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nora Franceschini, Claudia Giambartolomei, Paul S. de Vries, Chris Finan, Joshua C. Bis, Rachael P. Huntley, Ruth C. Lovering, Salman M. Tajuddin, Thomas W. Winkler, Misa Graff, Maryam Kavousi, Caroline Dale, Albert V. Smith, Edith Hofer, Elisabeth M. van Leeuwen, Ilja M. Nolte, Lingyi Lu, Markus Scholz, Muralidharan Sargurupremraj, Niina Pitkänen, Oscar Franzén, Peter K. Joshi, Raymond Noordam, Riccardo E. Marioni, Shih-Jen Hwang, Solomon K. Musani, Ulf Schminke, Walter Palmas, Aaron Isaacs, Adolfo Correa, Alan B. Zonderman, Albert Hofman, Alexander Teumer, Amanda J. Cox, André G. Uitterlinden, Andrew Wong, Andries J. Smit, Anne B. Newman, Annie Britton, Arno Ruusalepp, Bengt Sennblad, Bo Hedblad, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Brenda W. Penninx, Carl D. Langefeld, Christina L. Wassel, Christophe Tzourio, Cristiano Fava, Damiano Baldassarre, Daniel H. O’Leary, Daniel Teupser, Diana Kuh, Elena Tremoli, Elmo Mannarino, Enzo Grossi, Eric Boerwinkle, Eric E. Schadt, Erik Ingelsson, Fabrizio Veglia, Fernando Rivadeneira, Frank Beutner, Ganesh Chauhan, Gerardo Heiss, Harold Snieder, Harry Campbell, Henry Völzke, Hugh S. Markus, Ian J. Deary, J. Wouter Jukema, Jacqueline de Graaf, Jacqueline Price, Janne Pott, Jemma C. Hopewell, Jingjing Liang, Joachim Thiery, Jorgen Engmann, Karl Gertow, Kenneth Rice, Kent D. Taylor, Klodian Dhana, Lambertus A. L. M. Kiemeney, Lars Lind, Laura M. Raffield, Lenore J. Launer, Lesca M. Holdt, Marcus Dörr, Martin Dichgans, Matthew Traylor, Matthias Sitzer, Meena Kumari, Mika Kivimaki, Mike A. Nalls, Olle Melander, Olli Raitakari, Oscar H. Franco, Oscar L. Rueda-Ochoa, Panos Roussos, Peter H. Whincup, Philippe Amouyel, Philippe Giral, Pramod Anugu, Quenna Wong, Rainer Malik, Rainer Rauramaa, Ralph Burkhardt, Rebecca Hardy, Reinhold Schmidt, Renée de Mutsert, Richard W. Morris, Rona J. Strawbridge, S. Goya Wannamethee, Sara Hägg, Sonia Shah, Stela McLachlan, Stella Trompet, Sudha Seshadri, Sudhir Kurl, Susan R. Heckbert, Susan Ring, Tamara B. Harris, Terho Lehtimäki, Tessel E. Galesloot, Tina Shah, Ulf de Faire, Vincent Plagnol, Wayne D. Rosamond, Wendy Post, Xiaofeng Zhu, Xiaoling Zhang, Xiuqing Guo, Yasaman Saba, Abbas Dehghan, Adrie Seldenrijk, Alanna C. Morrison, Anders Hamsten, Bruce M. Psaty, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Deborah A. Lawlor, Dennis O. Mook-Kanamori, Donald W. Bowden, Helena Schmidt, James F. Wilson, James G. Wilson, Jerome I. Rotter, Joanna M. Wardlaw, John Deanfield, Julian Halcox, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Markus Loeffler, Michele K. Evans, Stéphanie Debette, Steve E. Humphries, Uwe Völker, Vilmundur Gudnason, Aroon D. Hingorani, Johan L. M. Björkegren, Juan P. Casas, Christopher J. O’Donnell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Egypt | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 272 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 22% |
| Unknown | 81 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 99 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,408,703
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#33,957
of 58,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,396
of 451,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#830
of 1,326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.