| Title |
Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients classified by AKIN versus RIFLE using the SAPS 3 database
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-009-1530-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Joannidis, Barbara Metnitz, Peter Bauer, Nicola Schusterschitz, Rui Moreno, Wilfred Druml, Philipp G. H. Metnitz |
| Abstract |
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. To provide a uniformly accepted definition, the RIFLE classification was introduced by the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative, recently modified by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), suggesting staging of AKI based on dynamic changes within 48 h. This study compares these two classification systems with regard to outcome. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Paraguay | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 228 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 11% |
| Other | 62 | 26% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 147 | 62% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,995,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,536
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,379
of 128,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.