| Title |
Tendinopathy in type 2 diabetes: a condition between specialties?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x700169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Baskerville, David E McCartney, Sarah M McCartney, Helen Dawes, Garry D Tan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 54% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,065,042
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,005
of 4,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,392
of 448,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#25
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.