You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increase anti‐poaching law‐enforcement or reduce demand for wildlife products? A framework to guide strategic conservation investments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12618 |
| Authors |
Matthew H. Holden, Duan Biggs, Henry Brink, Payal Bal, Jonathan Rhodes, Eve McDonald‐Madden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 13% |
| Australia | 16 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 11% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 58% |
| Scientists | 53 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 47 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 58 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#465,638
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#166
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,311
of 445,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.