↓ Skip to main content

Reassessing the Hu–Wen Era: A Golden Age or Lost Decade for Social Policy in China?

Overview of attention for article published in China Quarterly, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reassessing the Hu–Wen Era: A Golden Age or Lost Decade for Social Policy in China?
Published in
China Quarterly, December 2018
DOI 10.1017/s0305741018001200
Authors

Jude Howell, Jane Duckett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 38%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 65%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,824,516
of 25,603,577 outputs
Outputs from China Quarterly
#224
of 1,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,397
of 446,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from China Quarterly
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,603,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.