You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social Policy and Income Inequality during the Hu–Wen Era: A Progressive Legacy?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
China Quarterly, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0305741018001248 |
| Authors |
Qin Gao, Sui Yang, Fuhua Zhai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 39% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,376,627
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from China Quarterly
#400
of 1,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,162
of 446,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from China Quarterly
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.