You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Urban trees and the risk of poor birth outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health & Place, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.11.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geoffrey H. Donovan, Yvonne L. Michael, David T. Butry, Amy D. Sullivan, John M. Chase |
| Abstract |
This paper investigated whether greater tree-canopy cover is associated with reduced risk of poor birth outcomes in Portland, Oregon. Residential addresses were geocoded and linked to classified-aerial imagery to calculate tree-canopy cover in 50, 100, and 200 m buffers around each home in our sample (n=5696). Detailed data on maternal characteristics and additional neighborhood variables were obtained from birth certificates and tax records. We found that a 10% increase in tree-canopy cover within 50 m of a house reduced the number of small for gestational age births by 1.42 per 1000 births (95% CI-0.11-2.72). Results suggest that the natural environment may affect pregnancy outcomes and should be evaluated in future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 23% |
| Researcher | 40 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 51 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Design | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,201,950
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health & Place
#388
of 1,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,567
of 188,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health & Place
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.