You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-018-0286-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeroen R. Huyghe, Stephanie A. Bien, Tabitha A. Harrison, Hyun Min Kang, Sai Chen, Stephanie L. Schmit, David V. Conti, Conghui Qu, Jihyoun Jeon, Christopher K. Edlund, Peyton Greenside, Michael Wainberg, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Joshua D. Smith, David M. Levine, Sarah C. Nelson, Nasa A. Sinnott-Armstrong, Demetrius Albanes, M. Henar Alonso, Kristin Anderson, Coral Arnau-Collell, Volker Arndt, Christina Bamia, Barbara L. Banbury, John A. Baron, Sonja I. Berndt, Stéphane Bézieau, D. Timothy Bishop, Juergen Boehm, Heiner Boeing, Hermann Brenner, Stefanie Brezina, Stephan Buch, Daniel D. Buchanan, Andrea Burnett-Hartman, Katja Butterbach, Bette J. Caan, Peter T. Campbell, Christopher S. Carlson, Sergi Castellví-Bel, Andrew T. Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Sang Hee Cho, Charles M. Connolly, Amanda J. Cross, Katarina Cuk, Keith R. Curtis, Albert de la Chapelle, Kimberly F. Doheny, David Duggan, Douglas F. Easton, Sjoerd G. Elias, Faye Elliott, Dallas R. English, Edith J. M. Feskens, Jane C. Figueiredo, Rocky Fischer, Liesel M. FitzGerald, David Forman, Manish Gala, Steven Gallinger, W. James Gauderman, Graham G. Giles, Elizabeth Gillanders, Jian Gong, Phyllis J. Goodman, William M. Grady, John S. Grove, Andrea Gsur, Marc J. Gunter, Robert W. Haile, Jochen Hampe, Heather Hampel, Sophia Harlid, Richard B. Hayes, Philipp Hofer, Michael Hoffmeister, John L. Hopper, Wan-Ling Hsu, Wen-Yi Huang, Thomas J. Hudson, David J. Hunter, Gemma Ibañez-Sanz, Gregory E. Idos, Roxann Ingersoll, Rebecca D. Jackson, Eric J. Jacobs, Mark A. Jenkins, Amit D. Joshi, Corinne E. Joshu, Temitope O. Keku, Timothy J. Key, Hyeong Rok Kim, Emiko Kobayashi, Laurence N. Kolonel, Charles Kooperberg, Tilman Kühn, Sébastien Küry, Sun-Seog Kweon, Susanna C. Larsson, Cecelia A. Laurie, Loic Le Marchand, Suzanne M. Leal, Soo Chin Lee, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Mathieu Lemire, Christopher I. Li, Li Li, Wolfgang Lieb, Yi Lin, Annika Lindblom, Noralane M. Lindor, Hua Ling, Tin L. Louie, Satu Männistö, Sanford D. Markowitz, Vicente Martín, Giovanna Masala, Caroline E. McNeil, Marilena Melas, Roger L. Milne, Lorena Moreno, Neil Murphy, Robin Myte, Alessio Naccarati, Polly A. Newcomb, Kenneth Offit, Shuji Ogino, N. Charlotte Onland-Moret, Barbara Pardini, Patrick S. Parfrey, Rachel Pearlman, Vittorio Perduca, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Mila Pinchev, Elizabeth A. Platz, Ross L. Prentice, Elizabeth Pugh, Leon Raskin, Gad Rennert, Hedy S. Rennert, Elio Riboli, Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco, Jane Romm, Lori C. Sakoda, Clemens Schafmayer, Robert E. Schoen, Daniela Seminara, Mitul Shah, Tameka Shelford, Min-Ho Shin, Katerina Shulman, Sabina Sieri, Martha L. Slattery, Melissa C. Southey, Zsofia K. Stadler, Christa Stegmaier, Yu-Ru Su, Catherine M. Tangen, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Duncan C. Thomas, Sushma S. Thomas, Amanda E. Toland, Antonia Trichopoulou, Cornelia M. Ulrich, David J. Van Den Berg, Franzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Bethany Van Guelpen, Henk van Kranen, Joseph Vijai, Kala Visvanathan, Pavel Vodicka, Ludmila Vodickova, Veronika Vymetalkova, Korbinian Weigl, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Emily White, Aung Ko Win, C. Roland Wolf, Alicja Wolk, Michael O. Woods, Anna H. Wu, Syed H. Zaidi, Brent W. Zanke, Qing Zhang, Wei Zheng, Peter C. Scacheri, John D. Potter, Michael C. Bassik, Anshul Kundaje, Graham Casey, Victor Moreno, Goncalo R. Abecasis, Deborah A. Nickerson, Stephen B. Gruber, Li Hsu, Ulrike Peters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 21% |
| Spain | 14 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Comoros | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 62% |
| Scientists | 43 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 418 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 81 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 7% |
| Professor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 119 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 103 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 1% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 43 | 10% |
| Unknown | 141 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#214,208
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#350
of 7,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,371
of 447,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#9
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.