↓ Skip to main content

Effects of sitting up for five minutes versus immediately lying down after spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery on fluid and ephedrine requirement; a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Effects of sitting up for five minutes versus immediately lying down after spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery on fluid and ephedrine requirement; a randomized trial
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12630-011-9593-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Essam E. Abd El-Hakeem, Abdullah M. Kaki, Adnan A. Almazrooa, Nisma M. Al-Mansouri, Jamal A. Alhashemi

Abstract

Patient position after spinal anesthesia has had variable effects on blood pressure and ephedrine requirements. The aim of this study was to determine the effects that sitting the patient up for five minutes after spinal anesthesia would have on intraoperative fluid and ephedrine requirements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 43%
Unspecified 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,319
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,551
of 144,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.