You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Senior stakeholder views on policies to foster a culture of openness in the English National Health Service: a qualitative interview study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0141076818815509 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graham Paul Martin, Sarah Chew, Mary Dixon-Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 28% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,840,056
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#736
of 3,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,768
of 446,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.