| Title |
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-018-06613-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yunxiao Lyu, Yunxiao Cheng, Ting Li, Bin Cheng, Xin Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 5 | 17% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Libya | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 47% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,022,518
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#171
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,473
of 451,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#10
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.