| Title |
Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental and Resource Economics, August 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1011604818385 |
| Authors |
Patricia A. Champ, Richard C. Bishop |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 23% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 37 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#663
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,604
of 41,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.