You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conventional methods for enhancing connectivity in conservation planning do not always maintain gene flow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13315 |
| Authors |
Jeffrey O. Hanson, Richard A. Fuller, Jonathan R. Rhodes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,725,483
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,141
of 3,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,391
of 435,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.