You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Cultural, Folk, and Religious Beliefs and Practices on Delays in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer in African American Women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Women's Health (15409996), November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1089/jwh.2018.7031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia G. Moorman, Nadine J. Barrett, Frances Wang, J. Anthony Alberg, Elisa V. Bandera, J.B. Barnholtz-Sloan, Melissa Bondy, Michele L. Cote, Ellen Funkhouser, Linda E. Kelemen, Lauren C. Peres, Edwards S. Peters, A. G. Schwartz, Paul D. Terry, Sydnee Crankshaw, Sarah E. Abbott, Joellen M. Schildkraut |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 71% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 23% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#964,926
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
#284
of 2,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,696
of 447,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
#8
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.