| Title |
Delaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x700241 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Travers, Roman Romero-Ortuno, Jade Bailey, Marie-Therese Cooney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 333 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 92 | 28% |
| Ireland | 21 | 6% |
| Spain | 17 | 5% |
| Australia | 16 | 5% |
| United States | 13 | 4% |
| Canada | 12 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 132 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 202 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 74 | 22% |
| Scientists | 53 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 383 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 9% |
| Researcher | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 80 | 21% |
| Unknown | 127 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 14% |
| Unknown | 140 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#95,162
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#34
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,817
of 448,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.