| Title |
Incorporating knowledge uncertainty into species distribution modelling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-018-1675-y |
| Authors |
Aidin Niamir, Andrew K. Skidmore, Antonio-Román Muñoz, Albertus G. Toxopeus, Raimundo Real |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 22% |
| Germany | 4 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 25% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,961,989
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#440
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,496
of 442,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.