↓ Skip to main content

Pumas as ecosystem engineers: ungulate carcasses support beetle assemblages in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 4,521)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
184 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
38 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Pumas as ecosystem engineers: ungulate carcasses support beetle assemblages in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
Published in
Oecologia, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00442-018-4315-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua M. Barry, L. Mark Elbroch, Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens, Ronald J. Sarno, Lisa Seelye, Anna Kusler, Howard B. Quigley, Melissa M. Grigione

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 6 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 44 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 33%
Environmental Science 34 24%
Unspecified 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 49 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1464. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,385
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1
of 4,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 448,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.