You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictors of Emesis and Recovery Agitation With Emergency Department Ketamine Sedation: An Individual-Patient Data Meta-Analysis of 8,282 Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Emergency Medicine, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven M. Green, Mark G. Roback, Baruch Krauss, Lance Brown, Ray G. McGlone, Dewesh Agrawal, Michele McKee, Markus Weiss, Raymond D. Pitetti, Mark A. Hostetler, Joe E. Wathen, Greg Treston, Barbara M. Garcia Pena, Andreas C. Gerber, Joseph D. Losek, Emergency Department Ketamine Meta-Analysis Study Group |
| Abstract |
Acutely destabilized heart failure is one of the most common diagnoses in the modern health care system. It has high hospital readmission rates and significant short-, medium-, and long-term mortality, likely due to misdiagnosis or failure to assess adequate treatment before discharge. Cardiac biomarkers such as B-type natriuretic peptide and its amino terminal cleavage equivalent N-terminal fragment have rapidly become one of the key tools in the diagnosis and guidance of heart failure therapy. In this article, we shall review the data on the current use of the natriuretic peptides for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of heart failure in both the outpatient and inpatient settings. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 82 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,645,550
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#1,521
of 6,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,488
of 125,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.