↓ Skip to main content

Recent rodent models for Alzheimer’s disease: clinical implications and basic research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Recent rodent models for Alzheimer’s disease: clinical implications and basic research
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00702-011-0731-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nady Braidy, Pablo Muñoz, Adrian G. Palacios, Gloria Castellano-Gonzalez, Nibaldo C. Inestrosa, Roger S. Chung, Perminder Sachdev, Gilles J. Guillemin

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common origin of dementia in the elderly. Although the cause of AD remains unknown, several factors have been identified that appear to play a critical role in the development of this debilitating disorder. In particular, amyloid precursor protein (APP), tau hyperphosphorylation, and the secretase enzymes, have become the focal point of recent research. Over the last two decades, several transgenic and non-transgenic animal models have been developed to elucidate the mechanistic aspects of AD and to validate potential therapeutic targets. Transgenic rodent models over-expressing human β-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP) and mutant forms of tau have become precious tools to study and understand the pathogenesis of AD at the molecular, cellular and behavioural levels, and to test new therapeutic agents. Nevertheless, none of the transgenic models of AD recapitulate fully all of the pathological features of the disease. Octodon degu, a South American rodent has been recently found to spontaneously develop neuropathological signs of AD in old age. This review aims to address the limitations and clinical relevance of transgenic rodent models in AD, and to highlight the potential for O. degu as a natural model for the study of AD neuropathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 159 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 21%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 34%
Neuroscience 24 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#18,303,139
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#1,420
of 1,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,536
of 125,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.