↓ Skip to main content

Combination of conditional random field with a rule based method in the extraction of PICO elements

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Combination of conditional random field with a rule based method in the extraction of PICO elements
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12911-018-0699-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samir Chabou, Michal Iglewski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Computer Science 4 11%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 17 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,147,515
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,083
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,783
of 437,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#25
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.