↓ Skip to main content

Interior Ethnic Minority Boarding Schools: China’s Bold and Unpredictable Educational Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies Review, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 588)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interior Ethnic Minority Boarding Schools: China’s Bold and Unpredictable Educational Experiment
Published in
Asian Studies Review, December 2018
DOI 10.1080/10357823.2018.1548572
Authors

James Leibold

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 34%
Arts and Humanities 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,126,278
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#17
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,324
of 446,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.