↓ Skip to main content

Gift exchange or quid pro quo? Temporality, ambiguity, and stigma in interactions between pedestrians and service-providing panhandlers

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Society, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Gift exchange or quid pro quo? Temporality, ambiguity, and stigma in interactions between pedestrians and service-providing panhandlers
Published in
Theory and Society, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11186-018-9324-8
Authors

Mary Patrick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 22%
Social Sciences 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#20,326,500
of 24,989,834 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Society
#428
of 478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,010
of 336,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Society
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,989,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.