| Title |
Which task will we choose first? Precrastination and cognitive load in task ordering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13414-018-1633-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa R. Fournier, Emily Coder, Clark Kogan, Nisha Raghunath, Ezana Taddese, David A. Rosenbaum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#643,044
of 24,137,435 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#23
of 1,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,165
of 444,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.