| Title |
Multidimensional fetal flow imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-018-0498-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Datta Singh Goolaub, Christopher W. Roy, Eric Schrauben, Dafna Sussman, Davide Marini, Mike Seed, Christopher K. Macgowan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 35% |
| Engineering | 8 | 16% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,530,654
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#452
of 1,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,309
of 448,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.