You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-Term Follow-up after Tight Control of Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa0806359 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rury R Holman, Sanjoy K Paul, M Angelyn Bethel, H Andrew W Neil, David R Matthews |
| Abstract |
Post-trial monitoring of patients in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) examined whether risk reductions for microvascular and macrovascular disease, achieved with the use of improved blood-pressure control during the trial, would be sustained. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 405 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 80 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 14% |
| Other | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 98 | 22% |
| Unknown | 70 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 261 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 8% |
| Unknown | 83 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,369,982
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#18,328
of 32,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,280
of 98,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#100
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.