| Title |
Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x700265 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flore Laforest, Pia Kirkegaard, Baljinder Mann, Adrian Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 39% |
| Spain | 4 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,164,143
of 25,030,708 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#536
of 4,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,532
of 448,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#18
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,030,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.