↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of HDAC Activity by ITF2357 Ameliorates Joint Inflammation and Prevents Cartilage and Bone Destruction in Experimental Arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Inhibition of HDAC Activity by ITF2357 Ameliorates Joint Inflammation and Prevents Cartilage and Bone Destruction in Experimental Arthritis
Published in
Molecular Medicine, February 2011
DOI 10.2119/molmed.2011.00058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leo A B Joosten, Flavio Leoni, Sajeda Meghji, Paolo Mascagni

Abstract

Inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDAC) has been shown to modulate gene expression and cytokine production after stimulation with several stimuli. In the present study, the antiinflammatory effect of a potent HDACi, ITF2357, was explored in different experimental models of arthritis. In addition, the bone protective effect of ITF2357 was investigated in vitro. Treatment of acute arthritis (Streptococcus pyogenes cell wall [SCW] arthritis) with ITF2357 showed that joint swelling and cell influx into the joint cavity were reduced. Furthermore, the chondrocyte metabolic function was improved by treatment of ITF2357. The production of proinflammatory cytokines by synovial tissue was reduced after ITF2357 treatment. To examine the effect of HDAC inhibition on joint destruction, ITF2357 was applied to both rat adjuvant arthritis and mouse collagen type II arthritis. ITF2357 treatment both ameliorates the severity scores in arthritis models and prevents bone destruction. In an in vitro bone destruction assay, ITF2357 was highly effective at a dose of 100 nmol/L. In conclusion, inhibition of HDAC prevents joint inflammation and cartilage and bone destruction in experimental arthritis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2011.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#803
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,745
of 183,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.