↓ Skip to main content

Genetic determinants of risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension: international genome-wide association studies and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
50 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic determinants of risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension: international genome-wide association studies and meta-analysis
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30409-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Rhodes, Ken Batai, Marta Bleda, Matthias Haimel, Laura Southgate, Marine Germain, Michael W Pauciulo, Charaka Hadinnapola, Jurjan Aman, Barbara Girerd, Amit Arora, Jo Knight, Ken B Hanscombe, Jason H Karnes, Marika Kaakinen, Henning Gall, Anna Ulrich, Lars Harbaum, Inês Cebola, Jorge Ferrer, Katie Lutz, Emilia M Swietlik, Ferhaan Ahmad, Philippe Amouyel, Stephen L Archer, Rahul Argula, Eric D Austin, David Badesch, Sahil Bakshi, Christopher Barnett, Raymond Benza, Nitin Bhatt, Harm J Bogaard, Charles D Burger, Murali Chakinala, Colin Church, John G Coghlan, Robin Condliffe, Paul A Corris, Cesare Danesino, Stéphanie Debette, C Gregory Elliott, Jean Elwing, Melanie Eyries, Terry Fortin, Andre Franke, Robert P Frantz, Adaani Frost, Joe G N Garcia, Stefano Ghio, Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani, J Simon R Gibbs, John Harley, Hua He, Nicholas S Hill, Russel Hirsch, Arjan C Houweling, Luke S Howard, Dunbar Ivy, David G Kiely, James Klinger, Gabor Kovacs, Tim Lahm, Matthias Laudes, Rajiv D Machado, Robert V MacKenzie Ross, Keith Marsolo, Lisa J Martin, Shahin Moledina, David Montani, Steven D Nathan, Michael Newnham, Andrea Olschewski, Horst Olschewski, Ronald J Oudiz, Willem H Ouwehand, Andrew J Peacock, Joanna Pepke-Zaba, Zia Rehman, Ivan Robbins, Dan M Roden, Erika B Rosenzweig, Ghulam Saydain, Laura Scelsi, Robert Schilz, Werner Seeger, Christian M Shaffer, Robert W Simms, Marc Simon, Olivier Sitbon, Jay Suntharalingam, Haiyang Tang, Alexander Y Tchourbanov, Thenappan Thenappan, Fernando Torres, Mark R Toshner, Carmen M Treacy, Anton Vonk Noordegraaf, Quinten Waisfisz, Anna K Walsworth, Robert E Walter, John Wharton, R James White, Jeffrey Wilt, Stephen J Wort, Delphine Yung, Allan Lawrie, Marc Humbert, Florent Soubrier, David-Alexandre Trégouët, Inga Prokopenko, Richard Kittles, Stefan Gräf, William C Nichols, Richard C Trembath, Ankit A Desai, Nicholas W Morrell, Martin R Wilkins, NIHR BioResource Rare Diseases Consortium, PAH Cohort Study Consortium, PAH Biobank Consortium

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Master 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 67 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 73 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#925,944
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#618
of 2,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,944
of 445,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#9
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.