↓ Skip to main content

Essential Role of One-carbon Metabolism and Gcn4p and Bas1p Transcriptional Regulators during Adaptation to Anaerobic Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae *

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Essential Role of One-carbon Metabolism and Gcn4p and Bas1p Transcriptional Regulators during Adaptation to Anaerobic Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae *
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, February 2009
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m809225200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonny M. Tsoi, Anthony G. Beckhouse, Cristy L. Gelling, Mark J. Raftery, Joyce Chiu, Abraham M. Tsoi, Lars Lauterbach, Peter J. Rogers, Vincent J. Higgins, Ian W. Dawes

Abstract

The transcriptional activator Gcn4p is considered the master regulator of amino acid metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is required for the transcriptional response to amino acid starvation. Here it is shown that Gcn4p plays a previously undescribed role in regulating adaptation to anaerobic growth. A gcn4 mutant exhibited a highly extended lag phase after a shift to anaerobiosis that was the result of l-serine depletion. In addition, the one-carbon metabolism and purine biosynthesis transcriptional regulator Bas1p were strictly required for anaerobic growth on minimal medium, and this was similarly due to l-serine limitation in bas1 mutants. The induction of one-carbon metabolism during anaerobiosis is needed to increase the supply of l-serine from the glycine and threonine pathways. Using a number of experimental approaches, we demonstrate that these transcription regulators play vital roles in regulating l-serine biosynthesis in the face of increased demand during adaptation to anaerobiosis. This increased l-serine requirement is most likely due to anaerobic remodeling of the cell wall, involving de novo synthesis of a large number of very serine-rich mannoproteins and an increase in the total serine content of the cell wall. During anaerobic starvation for l-serine, this essential amino acid is preferentially directed to the cell wall, indicating the existence of a regulatory mechanism to balance competing cellular demands.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 27%
Chemistry 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2009.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#76,081
of 85,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,936
of 108,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#350
of 388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.