↓ Skip to main content

What is the impact of continuous cover forestry compared to clearcut forestry on stand-level biodiversity in boreal and temperate forests? A systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
What is the impact of continuous cover forestry compared to clearcut forestry on stand-level biodiversity in boreal and temperate forests? A systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13750-018-0138-y
Authors

Meelis Seedre, Adam Felton, Matts Lindbladh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 28%
Environmental Science 17 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,396,521
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#257
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,740
of 437,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.