↓ Skip to main content

Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
96 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Johnston, Shannon E Kelly, Shu-Ching Hsieh, Becky Skidmore, George A Wells

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 11 6%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 48 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 57 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#746,454
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#178
of 4,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,493
of 448,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#3
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.