↓ Skip to main content

A case of duodenal hemorrhage due to arteriovenous malformation around a serous cystic neoplasm

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A case of duodenal hemorrhage due to arteriovenous malformation around a serous cystic neoplasm
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40792-018-0547-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shunsuke Tamura, Yusuke Yamamoto, Yukiyasu Okamura, Teiichi Sugiura, Takaaki Ito, Ryo Ashida, Katsuhisa Ohgi, Nobuyuki Watanabe, Keiko Sasaki, Takashi Sugino, Katsuhiko Uesaka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Unspecified 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Unspecified 2 22%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,553,351
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#93
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,612
of 437,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them