↓ Skip to main content

Legitimacy and contestation in global governance: Revisiting the folk theory of international institutions

Overview of attention for article published in The Review of International Organizations, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Legitimacy and contestation in global governance: Revisiting the folk theory of international institutions
Published in
The Review of International Organizations, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11558-018-9338-z
Authors

Ian Hurd

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 12 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 53%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 24 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,069,427
of 24,713,766 outputs
Outputs from The Review of International Organizations
#95
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,240
of 446,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Review of International Organizations
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,713,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.