↓ Skip to main content

Evidence‐Based Choice of Esophageal Stent for the Palliative Management of Malignant Dysphagia

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Evidence‐Based Choice of Esophageal Stent for the Palliative Management of Malignant Dysphagia
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00268-008-9654-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danny Yakoub, Ramy Fahmy, Thanos Athanasiou, Afshin Alijani, Christopher Rao, Ara Darzi, George B. Hanna

Abstract

The type of stent used for the management of patients with malignant dysphagia is chosen according to subjective physician's preference. There is no recent study available to provide updated evidence on early outcomes related to the use of different types of stents.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,217
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,125
of 81,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.