↓ Skip to main content

A mechanistic classification of clinical phenotypes in neuroblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
74 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A mechanistic classification of clinical phenotypes in neuroblastoma
Published in
Science, December 2018
DOI 10.1126/science.aat6768
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Ackermann, Maria Cartolano, Barbara Hero, Anne Welte, Yvonne Kahlert, Andrea Roderwieser, Christoph Bartenhagen, Esther Walter, Judith Gecht, Laura Kerschke, Ruth Volland, Roopika Menon, Johannes M Heuckmann, Moritz Gartlgruber, Sabine Hartlieb, Kai-Oliver Henrich, Konstantin Okonechnikov, Janine Altmüller, Peter Nürnberg, Steve Lefever, Bram de Wilde, Frederik Sand, Fakhera Ikram, Carolina Rosswog, Janina Fischer, Jessica Theissen, Falk Hertwig, Aatur D Singhi, Thorsten Simon, Wenzel Vogel, Sven Perner, Barbara Krug, Matthias Schmidt, Sven Rahmann, Viktor Achter, Ulrich Lang, Christian Vokuhl, Monika Ortmann, Reinhard Büttner, Angelika Eggert, Frank Speleman, Roderick J O'Sullivan, Roman K Thomas, Frank Berthold, Jo Vandesompele, Alexander Schramm, Frank Westermann, Johannes H Schulte, Martin Peifer, Matthias Fischer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 306 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 16%
Student > Master 42 14%
Researcher 41 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 84 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 91 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 93 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#366,432
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Science
#9,549
of 82,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,994
of 444,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#286
of 1,124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.