↓ Skip to main content

MRI characteristics of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
MRI characteristics of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00415-009-5264-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milena Stosic, Julian Ambrus, Neeta Garg, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Murali Ramanathan, Bernadette Kalman, Alireza Minagar, Frederick E. Munschauer, Timothy M. Galey, Sara Hussein, Rohit Bakshi, Robert Zivadinov

Abstract

MRI findings of primary anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome (PAPLS) are difficult to distinguish from those of multiple sclerosis (MS). Only a few previous studies have compared conventional and non-conventional MRI findings in MS and PAPLS patients. In addition, MRI differences between anti-phospholipid antibody (APLA) positive (+) and APLA negative (-) MS patients have not been reported. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the differences in MRI measures among patients with PAPLS, MS and normal control (NC) subjects. We also explored non-conventional MRI measures in APLA+ and APLA- MS patients. Forty-nine (49) consecutive MS patients among whom 39 had relapsing-remitting (RR) and 10 secondary-progressive (SP) disease course, 30 patients with PAPLS and 49 NC were enrolled. Twenty-eight (28) MS patients were APLA+. MRI measures of T1- and T2-lesion volumes (LV) and brain atrophy, including fractions of whole brain (BPF), gray matter (GMF) and white matter (WMF), were evaluated. The magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) of T2- and T1-LVs and different normal-appearing brain tissue (NABT) compartments as well as diffusion-weighted imaging of whole brain mean parenchyma diffusivity (MPD) were obtained. MS patients differed significantly from NC in all MRI measures. PAPLS patients differed from NC in their T2-LV, in MTR measures and in MPD. When MS patients were compared to PAPLS patients, they showed significantly higher T2- and T1-LVs and T2-LV MTR, lower BPF and GMF and higher MPD. APLA+ RR and SPMS (all APLA+) patients showed significantly higher T2-LV, lower GMF, lower normal-appearing gray matter MTR and higher MPD when compared to APLA- patients. The results indicate that brain abnormalities can be detected in PAPLS patients with non-conventional MRI. MRI reveals more profound injury in patients with MS versus PAPLS. APLA mediates heterogeneous cerebral pathology that remains to be further investigated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Other 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 46%
Neuroscience 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,201
of 4,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,594
of 110,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.