↓ Skip to main content

Contingent Employment and Labour Market Pathways: Bridge or Trap?

Overview of attention for article published in European Sociological Review, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contingent Employment and Labour Market Pathways: Bridge or Trap?
Published in
European Sociological Review, December 2018
DOI 10.1093/esr/jcy045
Authors

Duncan McVicar, Mark Wooden, Inga Laß, Yin-King Fok

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,003,107
of 24,401,594 outputs
Outputs from European Sociological Review
#446
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,951
of 445,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Sociological Review
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,401,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.