↓ Skip to main content

Ecosystem-based fisheries management requires a change to the selective fishing philosophy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
737 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecosystem-based fisheries management requires a change to the selective fishing philosophy
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0912771107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shijie Zhou, Anthony D. M. Smith, André E. Punt, Anthony J. Richardson, Mark Gibbs, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Sean Pascoe, Catherine Bulman, Peter Bayliss, Keith Sainsbury

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 737 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
Canada 9 1%
Brazil 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Other 18 2%
Unknown 671 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 183 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 133 18%
Student > Master 106 14%
Student > Bachelor 62 8%
Other 33 4%
Other 129 18%
Unknown 91 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 316 43%
Environmental Science 193 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 2%
Social Sciences 15 2%
Other 51 7%
Unknown 129 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,262,389
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18,117
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,906
of 109,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#88
of 742 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 742 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.