| Title |
Medium-Range Narratives as a Complementary Tool to Principle-Based Prioritization in Sweden: Test Case “ADHD”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11673-018-9884-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| URN |
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-153250
|
| Authors |
Pier Jaarsma, Petra Gelhaus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,996,653
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#325
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,157
of 437,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.