↓ Skip to main content

Aspirin and lung cancer risk in a cohort study of women: dosage, duration and latency

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aspirin and lung cancer risk in a cohort study of women: dosage, duration and latency
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, September 2007
DOI 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603996
Pubmed ID
Authors

D Feskanich, C Bain, A T Chan, N Pandeya, F E Speizer, G A Colditz

Abstract

Aspirin may reduce the risk of cancer at some sites but its effect at the lung is unclear. We prospectively examined associations between aspirin use and risk of lung cancer in 109,348 women in the Nurses' Health study from 1980 to 2004. During this time, 1,360 lung cancers were documented in participants 36-82 years of age. Aspirin use and smoking were assessed every 2 years. Risk of lung cancer was a non-significant 16% lower for regular aspirin users of one or two tablets per week and a significant 55% higher for users of 15 or more tablets per week compared with women who never regularly used aspirin. Results were similar when limited to never smokers. For both the low and high quantity aspirin users, risk of lung cancer did not decline or increase with longer durations of use, and associations attenuated as the latency period between aspirin assessment and lung cancer diagnosis was lengthened. Our findings, together with those from previous clinical trials and prospective studies, do not provide consistent evidence that aspirin influences the development of lung cancer and further investigation is required with adjustment for smoking.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 32%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Engineering 3 12%
Computer Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2007.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#9,122
of 10,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,824
of 71,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#51
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.