↓ Skip to main content

Hydrologic Controls of Methane Dynamics in Karst Subterranean Estuaries

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrologic Controls of Methane Dynamics in Karst Subterranean Estuaries
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, December 2018
DOI 10.1029/2018gb006026
Authors

D. Brankovits, J. W. Pohlman, N. K. Ganju, T. M. Iliffe, N. Lowell, E. Roth, S. P. Sylva, J. A. Emmert, L. L. Lapham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 20%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Unspecified 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,956,451
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#626
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,644
of 436,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.