↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Plaque Sealing With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Moderate Nonsignificant Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Plaque Sealing With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Moderate Nonsignificant Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions
Published in
Circulation, November 2009
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.109.874057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josep Rodés-Cabau, Olivier F. Bertrand, Eric Larose, Jean-Pierre Déry, Stéphane Rinfret, Rodrigo Bagur, Guy Proulx, Can M. Nguyen, Mélanie Côté, Marie-Claude Landcop, Jean-Rock Boudreault, Jacques Rouleau, Louis Roy, Onil Gleeton, Gérald Barbeau, Bernard Noël, Javier Courtis, Gilles R. Dagenais, Jean-Pierre Després, Robert DeLarochellière

Abstract

The presence of moderate saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions is a major predictor of cardiac events late after coronary artery bypass grafting. We determined the effects of sealing moderate nonsignificant SVG lesions with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) on the prevention of SVG atherosclerosis progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Other 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 49%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#18,024
of 21,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,895
of 108,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#87
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.