| Title |
Real-time assessment of right and left ventricular volumes and function in children using high spatiotemporal resolution spiral bSSFP with compressed sensing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-018-0500-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer A. Steeden, Grzegorz T. Kowalik, Oliver Tann, Marina Hughes, Kristian H. Mortensen, Vivek Muthurangu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Engineering | 6 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,741,795
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#214
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,726
of 447,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.