| Title |
Generalizing remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): feasibility and benefit in Parkinson’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-018-0457-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bryan Dobbs, Natalie Pawlak, Milton Biagioni, Shashank Agarwal, Michael Shaw, Giuseppina Pilloni, Marom Bikson, Abhishek Datta, Leigh Charvet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 111 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 36 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
| Psychology | 20 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 130 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,614,484
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#191
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,328
of 436,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.