Title |
Validation of the 21-gene test as a predictor of clinical response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for ER+, HER2-negative breast cancer: the TransNEOS study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10549-018-4964-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hiroji Iwata, Norikazu Masuda, Yutaka Yamamoto, Tomomi Fujisawa, Tatsuya Toyama, Masahiro Kashiwaba, Shoichiro Ohtani, Naruto Taira, Takehiko Sakai, Yoshie Hasegawa, Rikiya Nakamura, Hiromitsu Akabane, Yukiko Shibahara, Hironobu Sasano, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Kentaro Sakamaki, Helen Bailey, Diana B. Cherbavaz, Debbie M. Jakubowski, Naoko Sugiyama, Calvin Chao, Yasuo Ohashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 19% |
Unknown | 37 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 43 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,521,186
of 24,723,421 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#176
of 4,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,311
of 346,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#6
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,723,421 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.