↓ Skip to main content

Stoichiometry of endothermy: shifting the quest from nitrogen to carbon

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stoichiometry of endothermy: shifting the quest from nitrogen to carbon
Published in
Ecology Letters, July 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01180.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Klaassen, Bart A. Nolet

Abstract

For many animals, notably herbivores, plants are often an inadequate food source given the low content of protein and high content of C-rich material. This conception is mainly based on studies on ectotherms. The validity of this conception for endotherms is unclear given their much higher carbon requirements for maintenance energy metabolism than ectotherms. Applying stoichiometric principles, we hypothesized that endotherms can cope with diets with much higher (metabolizable) carbon to nitrogen ratios than ectotherms. Using empirical data on birds, eutherian mammals, marsupials and reptiles, we compiled and compared measurements and allometric equations for energy metabolism as well as nitrogen requirements. Our analysis supports our hypothesis that plants, and especially their leaves, are generally sufficiently rich in nitrogen to fulfil protein demands in endotherms, at least during maintenance conditions, but less so in ectotherms. This has important implications with respect to community functioning and the evolution of endothermy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 89 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 22%
Other 10 9%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 55%
Environmental Science 28 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 9 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,731,326
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#1,486
of 3,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,537
of 86,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.