Title |
Evaluation of MCQs from MOOCs for common item writing flaws
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13104-018-3959-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eamon Costello, Jane C. Holland, Colette Kirwan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 6 | 25% |
Australia | 3 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Monaco | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Guyana | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Romania | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
Scientists | 6 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 21% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 2 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 32% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,882,138
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#210
of 4,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,535
of 447,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#6
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.