↓ Skip to main content

音を聴く聴覚の仕組み(誌上ビギナーズセミナー)

Overview of attention for article published in Acoustical Science and Technology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
音を聴く聴覚の仕組み(誌上ビギナーズセミナー)
Published in
Acoustical Science and Technology, September 2010
DOI 10.20697/jasj.66.9_458
Authors

平原 達也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,088,334
of 25,492,047 outputs
Outputs from Acoustical Science and Technology
#78
of 571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,050
of 104,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acoustical Science and Technology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,492,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.